The Air Current

With all the subtlety of a Norwegian Air Shuttle nose cone, European airline behemoth IAG bought a chunk of the planet’s most disruptive low-cost carrier.

The parent company of British Airways, Iberia, Vueling and Aer Lingus said in a statement that “the minority investment is intended to establish a position from which to initiate discussions with Norwegian, including the possibility of a full offer for Norwegian.”

Norwegian, which has been mightily struggling, said it had “no prior knowledge” before IAG’s 4.61% purchase.

Imbued by the spirit of Sir Freddie Laker, Norwegian’s entry and prospective exit has been a tale of near-Shakespearean proportions. The airline seeks to fly from everywhere to everywhere, a truly globalized carrier. And exploited the advantages of borders to create its borderless airline.

(NOTE: Its Irish air operator’s certificate was not solely for E.U.-U.S. traffic rights, explained its CEO Bjorn Kjos in an interview last year, but access to export financing from both Airbus and Boeing. Ireland is home market to neither – and adaptation of the Cape Town Convention meant the best lease and financing terms.)

Norwegian has had an undeniable impact. The emergence of both long-haul basic economy fares and premium economy seats on U.S. airlines was aimed at Norwegian’s customer base. British Airways name-checked Norwegian as the driving force behind packing an extra seat into each row of its Gatwick-based 777s.

“I’ve always said we’ll compete with Norwegian,” said IAG’s CEO Willie Walsh. “The difference between Norwegian and us is we’re profitable.”

And IAG’s low-cost long-haul Level was born last summer to match Norwegian move-for-move. The airline-within-an-airline is built from Iberia’s own costs – its reallocated A330s and crews – not a standalone structure like that of Qantas’ Jetstar or Air Canada’s Rouge.

But is that what Willie Walsh is after in Norwegian?

The low-cost carrier genuinely believes it has cracked the code for the 21st century airline. Norwegian went the other way as cross-border equity deals, joint ventures and massive continental mergers consolidated and integrated rivals.

(The track record of profitability, stability and sustainability tilts heavily toward the broadly integrated.)

In contrast, Norwegian’s management model is an enormous arms-length throttle control. The overwhelming majority of its operations are rented. And if not rented, what’s owned can be rented to someone else. The people, the planes, the maintenance. Broadly speaking, it’s a plug-and-play airline.

OSM Aviation, of which it now owns 50%, is the conduit by which the airline employs the overwhelming majority of its 9,500 staff. Not just flight and cabin crews, but back office positions like communications and marketing, too. OSM handles the complexity of HR and tax rules and regulations across the world with its varying AOCs and crew bases.

“Our target obviously is to have crews floating around in different AOCs, so we don’t need to have separate crews for each AOC. That’s where OSM comes in,” said Kjos in a February 2017 interview.

A rising industry tide means heavy demand for OSM’s services. Its clientele is a list of well-known carriers; Wow Air, FlyDubai, Condor, Finnair, Thomas Cook, TuiFly and Turkish Airlines among others.


The majority of Norwegian’s fleet is leased, but the aircraft that it does own are through its Arctic Aviation Assets unit, its own leasing portfolio. Its first customer, HK Express gets its A320neos through Arctic.

For its maintenance, Boeing even turns the wrenches (via British Airways in Cardiff) as part of Norwegian’s GoldCare agreements on its 787 fleet. That’s expanded even further with the arrival of its 737 Max fleet.

“You cannot be proficient in all these areas,” said Kjos. “If I set up a leasing company, I need the leasing company to have the proficiency to do the leasing. We run the airline. And when it comes to OSM, they have to be the proficient part in that area, we cannot do it. Otherwise I won’t be proficient at anything.”

In good times, the rest of the aviation ecosystem helps finances its operations. But in turbulent times, the contracted nature of the airline’s major functions means OSM and Arctic are vendors, too, just as Boeing is for GoldCare. Norwegian’s management specifies how much it needs and the vendors adjust accordingly.

I asked Kjos if the model is designed to work in the other direction.

“Our intention is not to scale down,” said Kjos with a laugh. “But not at the moment at least.”

Jon Ostrower is Editor-in-chief of The Air Current. Prior to launching TAC in June 2018, Ostrower served as Aviation Editor for CNN Worldwide, guiding the network's global coverage of the business and operations of flying. Ostrower joined CNN in 2016 following four and half years at the Wall Street Journal. Based first in Chicago and then in Washington, D.C. he covered Boeing, aviation safety and the business of global aerospace. Before that, Ostrower was editor of the award-winning FlightBlogger for Flightglobal and Flight International Magazine covering the development of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner and other new aircraft programs from 2007 to 2012. Ostrower, a Boston native, graduated from The George Washington University's School of Media and Public Affairs with a bachelor's degree in Political Communication. He is based in Seattle.

View Comments

There are currently no comments.
Next Post
error: Content is protected !!